What the House v. NCAA settlement means for Wisconsin Badgers athletics
Schools are officially allowed to pay their student-athletes. Here's what that means for the Wisconsin Badgers in this new era of college sports that are on the horizon.
We’re entering a new era of college athletics. And whether you're ready for it or not, the "rules" just changed—formally, legally, and structurally.
The House v. NCAA settlement was officially approved, clearing the way for schools like the University of Wisconsin to directly pay athletes for the first time in history. Forget the hypothetical talk. This is real now. And it's not just about unregulated NIL anymore—this is full-on revenue sharing from the top down.
This is college athletic departments becoming financial operations at scale.
The legal trigger? Judge Claudia Wilken’s approval of a multibillion-dollar settlement between the NCAA, its power conferences, and athletes across Division I. The ruling ended multiple antitrust lawsuits challenging the NCAA’s grip on amateurism—a grip they’ve held for far too long. And let’s be honest: anyone with a lick of foresight knew something had to change well before it got to this point.
Thanks to that decision, schools like Wisconsin can now disperse revenue from media rights and TV contracts to compensate their student-athletes with up to $20.5 million available annually for distribution across all sports starting in 2025. That cap will rise by 4% each year over the course of the 10-year agreement. With checks set to start going out July 1, the rollout has already been set in motion, and schools have been gearing up for it.
This money is in addition to existing scholarships and education benefits, meaning athletes will now receive both traditional aid and direct pay.
So, if you're wondering who controls the trajectory of your favorite program? You better start paying close attention to the athletic director, their general manager, and the financial decision-makers.
Because in this new model, football will get the largest slice of that pie—probably 75% or more at most Power Four schools. Men’s basketball follows, and then programs like volleyball, men’s hockey, and women’s hoops will make up the vast majority of what's left from that pot.
How the University of Wisconsin chooses to allocate that money will say a lot about what it values and where it wants to compete. This is where Athletic Director Chris McIntosh matters as much as anyone. The days of simply hiring a coach and hoping things fall into place are over.
The pressure now shifts to Wisconsin’s administrative backbone. With up to $20.5 million on the table—and that figure climbing annually—it’s not just about finding the right coach. It’s about having infrastructure: financial officers, cap strategists, recruiting analysts, and NIL compliance directors all moving in the same direction. Because this isn't just about attracting talent—it's about maintaining a highly competitive roster.
And here's the good news for Badgers fans: Wisconsin is better positioned for this financial transformation than most people probably realize. This is an athletic department that’s consistently ranked among the top revenue generators across all of college athletics—and more importantly, they saw the writing on the wall. They’ve been preparing for this.
According to a report from CNBC, Wisconsin ranks No. 15 nationally in athletics valuation, checking in at an estimated $198 million. That financial footing doesn’t just happen by accident—it’s the result of planning, donor engagement, and a willingness to adapt when the landscape changes.
The hope now is that schools like Wisconsin—programs with a strong infrastructure and a solid NIL operation already in place—can start to close the gap between themselves and the bluebloods. Not just with splashy one-off wins but with continuity. With structure. That means multi-year agreements, defined payment plans, and real frameworks that help prevent another Xavier Lucas-type scenario from unfolding again.
If these new rules are enforced the way they’ve been presented, I think it’s only a matter of time before they start working in Wisconsin’s favor. It can help.
"Despite the changing landscape, UW Athletics will remain focused on broad-based competition opportunities, academic achievement, and the life-long benefits that come from the college athletics experience," McIntosh said in a statement made in the fall of 2024. "The Athletic Department will continue to support the holistic development of student-athletes, though some aspects may look different than it has in the past.
"We are working hard to ensure Wisconsin Athletics will be competitive in the post-settlement world. As a result, we may seek new opportunities that would not have been considered in the past. Examples might be increased advertising and sponsorship opportunities or an increased number of non-Badger athletic events in our facilities,” McIntosh continued. “We are confident that fans will continue to support the next generation of Badger athletes as we reach for new heights."
The Badgers need a modern infrastructure: a GM-level mind whose sole responsibility is managing a roster, data analysts who are monitoring competitive benchmarks, and a financial model that backs up the vision. Without it, you're not just behind—you're cooked.
Sure, NIL still exists. But this decision is trying to bring some structure to the chaos. Any NIL deal over $600 will now need to be vetted by a new College Sports Commission clearinghouse for legitimacy. That means collectives can no longer operate in the shadows like they have been. Think of it as the NCAA’s attempt to centralize oversight—to shift NIL from a shadowy, untracked system into something visible and regulated.
That College Sports Commission is already taking shape. And it needed to.
On the same day that the settlement became official, the commission announced the hiring of longtime MLB executive Bryan Seeley as its CEO. His job? Build out an investigative team and oversee everything from NIL deal enforcement to how revenue sharing is tracked. It’s a massive undertaking—but the fact that this hire was ready the moment the ruling dropped tells you how serious the schools are about compliance.
Will it be perfect? Of course not. People will still find ways to operate in the gray area—and the McDonald’s bags full of cash won’t suddenly vanish overnight. But at least this is a step toward curbing some of the illegal tampering and injecting some accountability into the system.
There are new roster caps, too—105 for football, 15 for basketball, 26 for hockey, among others. Schools will have to determine exactly how many scholarships they want to offer (Wisconsin football has floated 85) since walk-on programs aren’t going away. They’ll also need to identify which athletes qualify to go above the limit as those hard caps are phased in.
Those numbers became a sticking point in court. Several athletes objected to the initial cap language, arguing it could cost thousands of players their spots. That led to late revisions, ensuring no athlete would be cut solely because of the new rules. But make no mistake—roster management just became even more of a puzzle, and schools like Wisconsin will have to be surgical in how they build.
And look, none of this guarantees parity. Schools like Ohio State, Oregon, Michigan, and Penn State will still outspend you if you’re not prepared. But the floor has been raised. And if you're Wisconsin? That means there's a chance—if the right people are in place and the model is built to compete in this post settlement era.
While this doesn’t make college athletes formal employees of the NCAA (yet), it puts us one step closer to a professionalized model without the unionization or collective bargaining protections that come with it. This isn’t an idea anymore. It’s the next version of what college sports will be moving forward. The question now is simple: will your program tread water—or take the next step?
While this solution doesn’t come close to fixing all the problems—far from it—it’s something it feels like we can all agree on, and it is a step in the right direction. This model will need adjustments. Mistakes will be made. More lawsuits are almost certainly coming. There’s just too much money involved for there not to be. But that doesn’t mean progress shouldn’t start happening now. For the first time in a long time, this feels like a genuine attempt to bring some order back to college athletics.
We appreciate you taking the time to read our work at BadgerNotes.com. Your support means the world to us and has helped us become a leading independent source for Wisconsin Badgers coverage.
You can also follow Site Publisher Dillon Graff at @DillonGraff on X.